H-1B Spouses Face Uncertainty with New H-4 EAD Decision


The fate of H-4 EAD, which allows the spouses of H-1B visa holders to work, is still up in the air after the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit kicked a decision over the program’s cancelation back to a lower court.

Save Jobs USA, the tech-workers advocacy group that filed
the lawsuit at the core of the case, suggests that the H-4 EAD could result in
employment for 180,000 spouses of H-1B holders, resulting in increased (and
unfair) competition for tech jobs. The lawsuit argues that the federal
government overstepped its bounds in establishing H-4 EAD.

The court’s ruling seemed to agree with the lawsuit’s position, stating: “The rule will increase competition for jobs.” However, those who possess the H-4 EAD can continue to work, at least for now. A new court ruling, or the introduction of new government regulation, could still kill the program.

H-4 EAD, H-1B Both Squeezed

this year, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) suggested that
ending H-4 EAD would prove “economically significant,” and ultimately benefit American

“Some U.S. workers would benefit from this proposed rule by having a better chance at obtaining jobs that some of the population of the H-4 workers currently hold, as the proposed rule would no longer allow H-4 workers to enter the labor market early.”

However, the federal government is still reviewing its plans
to potentially terminate H-4 EAD (the original deadline for a decision was
Spring 2019, which passed). In the meantime, it has made the application
process far more challenging: as of February 2019, anyone applying for the H-4 EAD needs to undergo
biometric screening

Meanwhile, the H-1B itself has been the focus of tightening
government policy. Through the third quarter of fiscal 2019, denial rates for
H-1B petitions have skyrocketed to 24 percent, according to a new analysis of
USCIS data by the National Foundation for American Policy (NFAP).

“In the
first three quarters of FY 2019, USCIS adjudicators denied 24 percent of H-1B
petitions for ‘initial’ employment and 12 percent of H-1B petitions for
‘continuing’ employment,” read
the NFAP report (PDF)
“The 12 percent denial rate for continuing employment is also historically
high—4 times higher than the denial rate of only 3 percent for H-1B petitions
for continuing employment as recently as FY 2015.” (A brief note on
definitions: ‘initial employment’ means H-1B petitions for new employment,
whereas ‘continuing employment’ is typically an extension for an existing

But that hasn’t stopped some of the country’s biggest tech companies from petitioning for H-1B visas—and subcontracting H-1B workers from services firms. Earlier this year, we analyzed a massive dataset from the U.S. Department of Labor on H-1B data for fiscal year 2019. Here’s what we found: ‘primary’ denotes direct H-1B petitioning, while ‘secondary’ represents subcontracting:

Meanwhile, the government continues to tighten the H-1B process. USCIS wants to institute a $10 registration fee for each H-1B visa application (the added money will supposedly allow it to better “adjudicate” applications), and companies petitioning for H-1B visa are being asked more intensive questions about the nature of the work those workers will be doing.  



What are you interested in? Explore some of the best tips from around the city from our partners and friends.